Our Family of Companies
western & southern financial group
western & southern life
columbus life insurance company
eagle realty group
fort washington investment advisors
gerber life insurance
integrity life insurance company
lafayette life insurance company
national integrity life insurance company
touchstone investments
western & southern financial group distributors

Will All This Fiscal Stimulus Eventually Stoke Inflation?

By Richard "Crit" Thomas, CFA, CAIA
Economy & Markets In the News
Share:
Office skyscraper in the sun

Many believe that with the U.S. Federal Reserve (Fed) printing money and the government spending it, we are sowing the seeds for an inflationary shock. An unanticipated rise in inflation could result in significant selloffs for both stocks and bonds, making it a very important topic for investors. We do not believe inflation is a near-term risk, but one could question whether the seeds are being sown for an environment that is more conducive to inflation after this virus crisis ends.

What Causes Inflation?

At its most basic, inflation occurs when demand exceeds supply. Said differently, when too much money is chasing too few goods and services. From a policy perspective, demand can be increased through either monetary or fiscal stimulus. In a previous article I looked at whether the Fed’s quantitative easing program could drive inflation. My conclusion was that, in isolation, it wouldn’t be inflationary, though it is likely boosting financial assets (i.e., asset price inflation). Now I want to turn to fiscal stimulus and whether it could fuel inflation.

How Fiscal Stimulus Works

The basic idea behind fiscal stimulus is to take money that is sitting idle and put it in the hands of individuals who are more likely to spend it. The fiscal stimulus packages to date have been designed with the intention to restore income to those who temporarily lost their jobs due to the economic shutdown and thus help bridge the gap until their businesses re-open.

Too Much Stimulus?

The announced stimulus packages to-date, combined with the economic downturn, is forecast to add $3.3 trillion to the 2020 fiscal deficit (which was already on track to exceed $1 trillion). Fiscal stimulus of this magnitude has not been seen since World War II (WWII). Was it enough? In the just reported GDP for the second quarter, personal income increased 7% from the first quarter, which was the strongest quarter-over-quarter (Q/Q) increase in history. If we back out the contribution of government transfers to income, then income fell 6% Q/Q, which would be the worst decline in history. Consumer savings meanwhile increased by $3.1 trillion. This data suggests there was plenty of stimulus money to cover the income loss during the shutdown. But we have not vanquished the virus and the stimulus is running out. That suggests more stimulus is coming (without it, the near-term risk is deflation, not inflation). But given the magnitude of this stimulus, why doesn’t it feel like it was giant success?

Fiscal Stimulus Boosted Consumer Income and Savings in the 2Q While Spending Fell
(billions of dollars, seasonally adjusted at annual rates)

Billions of dollars, seasonally adjusted annual rateSource: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis

"It Seems Scattershot" Jeremy Siegel

Fiscal stimulus is a blunt tool. Due to inefficiencies, it missed many who were in need as well as provided money to those who were not. Because of the uneven nature of the fiscal stimulus and the sustained impact on industries that require social contact, it has not prevented bankruptcies and business closures. Yelp, which publishes crowd-sourced business reviews, noted in its Economic Average report that as of July 10, “the percentage of permanent to temporary business closures is rising, with permanent closures now accounting for 55% of all closed businesses.”1 And should social distancing continue into the fall and winter (which seems likely), business closures seem likely to continue.

Could the supply reduction from these business closures eventually lead to higher prices? It is certainly possible, but the vast majority of business closures to date are composed of restaurants and retail stores. These businesses do have strong substitutes (take-out and eat at home for restaurants and ecommerce for retail) that are likely to keep a lid on their ability to raise prices. In addition, with capacity reduction comes more job losses that in turn will depress demand. These jobs tend to be low wage, which is one of the unique aspects of this downturn. There is inflationary risk from stimulus that went to savings, creating future spending fuel for when social distancing goes away.

Social Distancing Needs to Go Away

Social distancing could quickly go away with a vaccine that is widely available and effective. This would create the risk of consumer spending reigniting before supply gets rebuilt. Pent-up demand and excess savings from the stimulus could flood the economy with demand for goods and services, thereby putting upward pressure on prices. As strange as it is to say, that would suggest an effective vaccine holds the potential for hurting stocks and bonds. Inflationary conditions would put upward pressure on interest rates (leading to lower bond prices and price-to-earnings multiples), and would also remove the need for further monetary and fiscal stimulus (another important market driver). But in order for this to happen, investors would need to believe that the higher rate of inflation could be sustained for a long time.

Secular Versus Cyclical

The previous economic cycle which started in 2009 was the weakest expansion in terms of GDP growth since WWII. This was despite unprecedented monetary stimulus. And while the unemployment rate dove to levels that were well below the Fed’s estimate of full employment, it was not able to reach its inflation target of 2%. I believe this is due to a number of secular forces, that are global in nature, which have been putting downward pressure on inflation.

Many pundits believe that we are heading into an inflationary period like that experienced in the 1970s. These prognostications are based on the potential of a coordinated monetary and fiscal stimulus that continues into the future. In my next article I will explore this risk.


1 https://www.yelpeconomicaverage.com/yea-q2-2020

The information provided represents Touchstone’s views and observations regarding past and current market conditions and investor behaviors. The information and statements provided here are believed to be true and accurate. There can be no assurance however that the beliefs expressed herein will be consistent with future market conditions and investor behaviors.

This commentary is for informational purposes only and should not be used or construed as an offer to sell, a solicitation of an offer to buy or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. Investing in an index is not possible. Investing involves risk, including the possible loss of principal and fluctuation of value. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Please consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of the fund carefully before investing. The prospectus and the summary prospectus contain this and other information about the Fund. To obtain a prospectus or a summary prospectus, contact your financial professional or download and/or request one on the resources section or call Touchstone at 800-638-8194. Please read the prospectus and/or summary prospectus carefully before investing.

Touchstone Funds are distributed by Touchstone Securities, Inc.*
*A registered broker-dealer and member FINRA/SIPC.
Touchstone is a member of Western & Southern Financial Group

Not FDIC Insured | No Bank Guarantee | May Lose Value

crit thomas global market strategist

Richard "Crit" Thomas, CFA, CAIA

Global Market Strategist
Crit is responsible for examining and evaluating economic conditions, generating insights and providing a sharpened perspective on investment strategies for enriched portfolio construction.

Related Insights