Fort Washington has managed exclusionary screening mandates since the firm’s inception. This practice allows clients to align their portfolios with values, mission-driven objectives, or specific ethical considerations.
Exclusionary screens are customized to client requirements and implemented in accordance with each client’s investment policy statement. These may include, but are not limited to, exclusions related to: alcohol, tobacco, and weapons manufacturing or distribution; fossil fuel exposure, including specific revenue thresholds; involvement in human rights violations; activities inconsistent with faith-based principles; country-specific or sanctions-related restrictions.
In addition to client-directed exclusions, certain Fort Washington investment strategies incorporate proactive ESG-risk-based exclusions. These strategies may choose to exclude or avoid securities that demonstrate persistently poor ESG characteristics—including low third-party ESG ratings (e.g., MSCI CCC-rated issuers) or material unmanaged ESG risks—even in the absence of explicit client-directed restrictions.
As part of Fort Washington’s broader stewardship philosophy, the firm may also consider engagement and escalation when material sustainability risks or governance concerns arise. If a company shows limited responsiveness to investor feedback or demonstrates inadequate progress on identified issues, escalation—ranging from enhanced monitoring or eventual divestment—may be employed to protect client interests and support long-term value.
The rationale for these exclusions includes:
- Elevated potential for regulatory, legal, or reputational risk.
- Weak governance structures that may impair long-term performance.
- Environmental or social practices that pose meaningful downside risk.
- Limited evidence of improvement or responsiveness by company leadership.